Cognitive Behavioral Therapy For Anxiety

Helping Ohioans Deal With Worry, Fear, and Panic

Introduction to Emotional Regulation Basics

Most of us have a complicated relationship with our emotions. We're often taught, directly or indirectly, that feelings are things to be controlled, tamed, or even ignored.

When a wave of sadness, anger, or anxiety hits, the default reaction is often to fight it, judge ourselves for having it, or numb it. This constant battle is exhausting, and it rarely works. It can leave you feeling like you’re fundamentally failing at being human.

This is where many people enter therapy.

I'm a long time client of therapy and because of my neurodivergent brain I need very literal instructions to learn something new. Abstract ideas don't work well with me which is why I struggle with math when it goes from physical things to concepts and theories.

I've always understood the concept of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; change your stinking thinking, change your life. I'd get worksheets and identify what I was telling myself, and I'd write all of the positive affirmations about gratitude and self-reflection; and they all helped me feel better. And also, it never really got rid of the inner-critic.

So after I'd pause therapy for a bit I'd flip right back to the racing thoughts, shame, and never ending list of things that will be procrastinated and not get done.

In my mental health journey I found a source of profound, practical wisdom in a place I never expected: in my externship when I worked in an Interdisciplinary Pain Clinic and found the instruction manual for Cognitive Behavioral Therapy called, Dialectical Behavior Therapy or DBT.

This form of therapy was developed in the 1980s by a brilliant clinical psychologist named Marsha Linehan, PhD. She created a blueprint to motivate people to make changes to their emotional reactions while acknowledging it's a hard thing to do. Hence the name, dialectic.

DBT isn't a collection of vague affirmations; it's a skills-based therapeutic approach designed to help people who experience incredibly intense emotions. Sifting through these clinical-looking documents, I was struck by how a few core assumptions offered a radically different—and far more compassionate and effective—way to approach our inner lives.

This article shares four of the most impactful takeaways from those handouts. They aren't quick fixes or life hacks. They are fundamental shifts in perspective that, when woven together, form a powerful philosophy of radical compassion paired with radical responsibility.

Assumption 1: You Are Doing the Best You Can, AND You Need to Do Better

At first glance, this core assumption of DBT sounds like a complete contradiction. But within this paradox lies an engine for change. It’s a framework that holds two seemingly opposite truths in perfect balance: one of radical compassion and one of radical responsibility.

The first half—the radical compassion—is the idea that "People are doing the best they can." This isn't just a feel-good platitude; it's based on another core assumption that all behaviors (actions, thoughts, emotions) are caused. At any given moment, what you do is the result of a chain of causes—your history, your emotional state, the skills you have, the situation you’re in. It suggests that if you could have done better, you would have. This perspective dismantles the shame that keeps us stuck.

The second half—the radical responsibility—is the simultaneous belief that "People need to do better, try harder, and be more motivated to change." This prevents acceptance from becoming an excuse. It validates the need for growth and affirms that a better life is possible. It’s the voice that says, "I understand with compassion why you are here, and I believe in your responsibility and power to get somewhere else."

People are doing the best they can.

Assumption 2: When Faced with a Difficult Situation, You Have Four and Only Four Options

This brilliantly simple framework from a DBT handout cuts through the confusion and overwhelm that often accompany life's problems. It forces a moment of radical clarity by laying out every possible path, including the one we often take without realizing it's a choice.

The four options for solving any problem are:

1. Solve the problem: Take action to change the situation or leave it entirely.

2. Feel better about the problem: Work to change (or regulate) your emotional response to the situation.

3. Tolerate the problem: Fully accept the problem and your emotional response to it, without trying to change them.

4. Stay miserable: Or possibly make it worse.

   
   

The genius of this list is how DBT defines that fourth option.

The handout clarifies exactly how to achieve misery: Use no skills! Most of us don't consciously choose to "stay miserable," but by not actively choosing one of the first three skillful options, we are effectively choosing the fourth. Seeing it written down in black and white reframes inaction. It’s not a passive state of being stuck; it’s the active choice to not apply skills. This stark realization can be an incredibly powerful motivator to consciously pick a more effective path.

Assumption 3: Intense Emotions Aren't a Character Flaw—They're a 'Transaction'

Why do some people seem to feel things so much more deeply than others? DBT's Biosocial Theory offers a compelling, non-judgmental answer. It suggests that high emotional intensity isn't a sign of weakness or a character flaw. Instead, it arises from a "transaction" between a person's biological makeup and their social environment.

The "Bio" part of the theory states that some people are simply born with a higher level of emotional vulnerability. This means they are more sensitive to emotional triggers, experience emotions with greater intensity, and take a longer time to return to their emotional baseline after being upset. Their feelings can hit them like a "ton of bricks" when others might barely notice a stimulus.

The "Social" part refers to the "invalidating social environment." This is an environment that consistently dismisses, punishes, or misunderstands a person's emotional experience. It’s the parent who says, "Quit your blubbering," or the teacher who insists, "Normal people don't get this frustrated."

The source material gives a painfully vivid example: someone screams, "There's a fire!" and the person next to them calmly replies, "You're overreacting. What's wrong with you? There's no fire."

The handout beautifully describes this experience as being "a tulip in a rose garden"—your authentic self is treated as wrong or out of place. The theory is "transactional" because this biology and environment interact and escalate each other over time, making it harder and harder to regulate emotions.

An invalidating environment doesn't seem to understand your emotions. It tells you your emotions are invalid, weird, wrong, or bad.

Assumption 4: It May Not Be Your Fault, But It Is Your Problem to Solve

This final takeaway is perhaps the most empowering, and it ties the entire philosophy together. Building directly on the Biosocial Theory, it makes a critical distinction between blame and responsibility. This is where radical compassion meets its partner, radical responsibility, head-on.

The Biosocial Theory offers compassion: You did not choose your genetics or the environment you grew up in. Those things are not your fault. And yet, this principle provides the call to responsibility: the life you have today is the only one you've got.

The challenges you face are yours to navigate. This is not a harsh judgment but a practical one, rooted in another DBT assumption: "Figuring out and changing the causes of behavior work better than judging and blaming."

Blame looks backward, trying to assign fault. It's an endless, energy-draining loop. Responsibility looks forward, focusing on what must be done to make things better. This principle liberates you from the trap of assigning blame—to yourself or others—and channels your energy into the practical, hopeful work of problem-solving. Instead of asking "Whose fault is this?" you can begin to ask "What can I do about this?"

People may not have caused all of our own problems, but they have to solve them anyway.

Conclusion

Taken together, these skills from DBT offer a powerful philosophy for personal growth.

They teach a way of being that combines radical compassion with radical responsibility. You can fully accept the reality of your emotional world and the history that shaped it, without judgment or shame.

At the same time, you can recognize that you hold the power and the responsibility to learn new skills, make different choices, and move your life in a new direction. It’s a profound reminder that understanding and acceptance are not the final destinations—they are the starting blocks for meaningful change.

What might change if you fully accepted that you are doing your best, and that you also have the power to solve the problems in front of you?

Listen to more here:

Frequently Asked Questions

Q: Let's start with the basics. What is Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT), and why does it have that name?

A: Dialectical Behavior Therapy, or DBT, is a form of CBT. It's a skills-based therapeutic approach developed by Marsha Linehan, PhD. It was specifically designed to help people who experience incredibly intense emotions by teaching them practical tools from four core modules: Mindfulness, Distress Tolerance, Emotion Regulation, and Interpersonal Effectiveness. These skills provide a roadmap for navigating emotional, behavioral, and interpersonal challenges.

The name comes from the core concept of a "dialectic," which is the idea of holding two seemingly opposite ideas or truths in balance at the same time. The central dialectic in DBT is the synthesis of radical compassion (which involves acceptance of yourself and your current situation) with radical responsibility (the recognition that you must work to change). Instead of seeing these as contradictory,

DBT views them as necessary partners. This philosophy provides a blueprint to motivate people to make changes while acknowledging how difficult that change can be. The most foundational example of this dialectic is expressed in one of its core assumptions.

Q: A core idea in DBT is "You are doing the best you can, AND you need to do better." How can both of those things be true at the same time?

A: This apparent paradox is the engine that drives change in DBT. It masterfully balances validation with a call to action. Let's break down each half of the statement.

First is the half representing radical compassion: "People are doing the best they can." This isn't just a comforting phrase; it’s grounded in another DBT assumption that all behaviors—including our thoughts and emotions—are caused.

At any given moment, your actions are the result of a long chain of events: your personal history, your current emotional state, the environment you're in, and the skills you have available. This perspective suggests that if you could have done better in that moment, you would have. Understanding this helps dismantle the shame that so often keeps us feeling stuck and worthless.

The second half represents radical responsibility: "People need to do better, try harder, and be more motivated to change." This is the essential force that prevents acceptance from becoming an excuse for inaction. It validates the human desire for growth and affirms that building a better, more fulfilling life is possible.

It is the voice that says, "I understand with compassion why you are here, and I believe in your responsibility and power to get somewhere else." Crucially, this call to 'do better' is not a judgment, but a recognition that the 'best you can do' can be improved by learning new, more effective skills.

Holding both of these truths simultaneously creates a powerful foundation for growth. It validates your current struggles without judgment while empowering you to take ownership of your future.

Q: When I'm overwhelmed by a problem, it feels like I'm just stuck. According to DBT, what are my real options?

A: This feeling of being stuck is incredibly common. DBT cuts through the confusion of an overwhelming moment by providing a framework of radical clarity. It posits that when facing any problem, you have "four and only four options."

• Solve the problem: Change the situation or leave it.

• Feel better about the problem: Change or regulate your emotional response.

• Tolerate the problem: Accept the problem and your response to it.

• Stay miserable: Or possibly make it worse.

The genius of this framework lies in the fourth option. It reframes what we often experience as a passive state of being stuck into an active choice. How do you choose to stay miserable? The DBT handout clarifies: Use no skills! 

By not consciously choosing one of the first three skillful options, we are, by default, choosing the fourth. This realization can be a powerful motivator, transforming inaction from a state of helplessness into a decision that can be changed.

To add a layer of practical depth, these first three options map directly to the core skills taught in DBT:

• Solving the problem might involve using Interpersonal Effectiveness skills to ask for what you need, say no to an unreasonable request, or end a relationship that is causing you harm.

• Feeling better about the problem is the work of Emotion Regulation skills, which teach you how to understand your emotions and change them when they don't fit the facts.

• Tolerating the problem relies on Distress Tolerance and Mindfulness skills, which help you survive a crisis without making it worse and accept reality as it is in the moment.

Q: I often feel like my emotions are much more intense than other people's. Is that a personal failing?

A: Absolutely not. DBT directly refutes the idea that intense emotions are a character flaw or a sign of weakness. Instead, it offers a non-judgmental explanation called the Biosocial Theory. This theory suggests that high emotional intensity arises from a "transaction" between a person's biological makeup and their social environment.

• The "Bio" Component: This part of the theory states that some people are born with a higher degree of emotional vulnerability. This is a biological reality. It can mean you are more sensitive to emotional stimuli, able to detect subtle emotional information that others miss. It can also mean your emotions seem to hit for no reason, from "out of the blue," feel much more intense (the source material says they can hit "like a ton of bricks"), and take longer than others to return to your emotional baseline after being upset.

• The "Social" Component: This refers to an "invalidating social environment." This is any environment—familial, academic, or social—that consistently dismisses, punishes, or misunderstands a person's emotional experiences. It’s the parent who says, "Quit your blubbering," or "Don't be such a baby!" It’s the friend who tells you, "You're overreacting." The theory uses the powerful metaphor of being "a tulip in a rose garden," where your authentic emotional self is treated as if it's wrong or out of place.

The theory is described as "transactional" because these two factors influence and escalate each other over time. A biologically vulnerable person expresses intense emotion, and an invalidating environment responds poorly, which in turn heightens the person's emotional response, creating a difficult cycle. This theory is often a source of immense relief for my clients. It moves the conversation from one of self-blame—"What's wrong with me?"—to one of understanding and compassion—"What happened to me, and what skills can I learn now?"

An invalidating environment doesn't seem to understand your emotions. It tells you your emotions are invalid, weird, wrong, or bad.

Q: If my biology and past environment contributed to my struggles, how is it my responsibility to solve them?

A: This question gets to the very heart of the dialectic between radical compassion and radical responsibility. DBT makes a critical distinction between blame and responsibility.

The Biosocial Theory offers compassion. It validates that you did not choose your genetics, your temperament, or the environment you were raised in. The factors that contributed to your struggles are not your fault. This is a crucial starting point for healing, as it lifts the heavy burden of self-blame.

However, compassion for the past must be paired with responsibility for the present. While the problems may not be your fault, your life today is the only one you have, and the challenges you face are yours to navigate. This isn't a harsh judgment; it's a practical and empowering reality. The core principle here is captured perfectly in another DBT assumption: "Figuring out and changing the causes of behavior work better than judging and blaming."

Blame is a loop that looks backward, draining energy without creating change. Responsibility looks forward, focusing your energy on the practical, hopeful work of problem-solving. This shift from asking "Whose fault is this?" to "What can I do about this?" is often the most pivotal moment in therapy. It's where real, sustainable change begins.

People may not have caused all of our own problems, but they have to solve them anyway.

Q: So, what is the single most important takeaway from this DBT-inspired philosophy?

A: The most important takeaway is the transformative power of embracing the dialectic—that powerful combination of radical compassion and radical responsibility.

This philosophy allows you to fully accept your reality—your emotional world, the intensity of your feelings, and the history that shaped you—without shame or judgment. It gives you permission to be exactly where you are.

At the very same time, it empowers you with the profound recognition that you hold the responsibility and the ability to build a different future. It reminds you that acceptance is not a final destination; it is the starting block for meaningful change. You have the power to learn new skills, make different choices, and build what DBT calls a "life worth living."

What might change if you fully accepted that you are doing your best, and that you also have the power to solve the problems in front of you?

Tap Here To Check Out Emotional Regulation Basics - A FREE Program